help clarify the main differences between types of classified management, as i’ve grown tired of hearing people equate security managers with ssos and cpsrs with ssrs. the confusion is understandable for those who haven’t made a career of working in government security, as “sensitive” is the first word describing intelligence information and facilities (sci) , whereas the person who manages sci is a “special” security officer (not a “sensitive security officer”). and just to ensure that this handful of definitions below doesn’t make things too easy to understand, the national reconnaissance office (nro)–a member of the us intelligence community (ic)–likes to identify its ssrs as psos, just to be different. sensitive compartmented information (sci) – has to do with intelligence sources, methods and capabilities. sensitive compartmented information facility (scif) – a highly secure facility specially designed to protect sci information and systems from exploitation.
special access program (sap) – specialized management system of additional security controls and procedures designed to protect sar information related to a specific capability or capabilities. special access program facility (sapf) – a highly secure facility specially designed to protect sap information and systems from exploitation. in the united states intelligence community, ‘collateral’ information is also referred to as ‘genser’ (general service). special security officer (sso) – government official responsible for the management of sci information, sci-indoctrinated personnel and facilities. program security officer (pso) – government official responsible for the management of sap information for a specific program or programs. contractor program security officer (cpso) – contractor responsible for sap/sar (sapf) management in non-government sapfs for a specific company.
update: allow me to elaborate. i understand the sap process, sci is where it gets hazy. hypothetical example: let’s say help clarify the main differences between types of classified management, as i’ve grown tired of special access programs (saps) in the u.s. federal government are within the department of defense, sap is better known as “sar” by the mandatory there is some disagreement within the government as to whether or not sci is a sap., what is sci indoctrination, what is sci indoctrination, sap clearance process, what are the 5 levels of security clearance, sci clearance. sci stands for sensitive compartmented information and sap stands for special access program. security clearance levels come with different investigations and different challenges. as the name says some information is segregated into compartments and can only be accessed by people who are \u201cread on\u201d to the program.sep 19, 2011
can someone explain to me the difference in the investigation of sap vs. sci? which one is tougher to get and/or 15 years clean is a positive but they are going to be interested in the felony charge more than the plea to sensitive compartmented information (sci) is a the sci moniker is normally used by the national and the fact of this access is recorded in a local access register well-known intelligence special access program (sap)., security clearance levels chart, special access program training, ts vs ts/sci, what does ts/sci eligible mean
When you search for the What is the difference between SCI and SAP , you may look for related areas such as what is sci indoctrination, sap clearance process, what are the 5 levels of security clearance, sci clearance, security clearance levels chart, special access program training, ts vs ts/sci, what does ts/sci eligible mean. is sci higher than top secret? what is the difference between ts and sci? what does ts sci mean? what is a sap clearance?